Pop Culture

Maybe a Princess Diana Musical Wasn’t Such a Great Idea

Set to open on Broadway this fall, but already on Netflix, Diana could mean bad things for the whole Diana industry.

Next month, a sensitive film portrait of Diana Spencer, simply called Spencer, will begin playing in theaters. Its release will follow a much-ballyhooed film festival tour, eliciting raves from critics who praised director Pablo Larraín’s bold artistry and Kristen Stewart’s thoroughly committed performance. Spencer is poised to be one of the indie arthouse movies of the season, on its way to maybe, just maybe, securing Stewart her first Oscar nomination.

The trouble for Spencer is that it’s just been upstaged, or at least beaten to the punch. Last Friday, Netflix premiered a filmed, eerily audience-less performance of Diana, a new musical about the late Princess of Wales that was set to open on Broadway in 2020 before the pandemic scuttled its plans. Though it will finally make its bow on the Great White Way later this fall, those champing at the bit to see a singing, occasionally dancing Diana and QEII and Camilla Parker Bowles can simply watch Diana at home. The question, then, is this: has Diana ruined it for Spencer?

Quality wise, no. Spencer offers a compelling new take on the lore of Princess Di, depicting her in intimate and probing closeup as she makes perhaps the biggest decision of her adult life. Though Larraín’s film will certainly not be for everyone—tolerances for serious camp varying as they do—it is at least made with true intention. There is a soul behind the piece, animating it and driving it along toward what I guess you could call relevance.

Diana, on the other hand, is a shellacked lump of product born solely of cold, money-minded cynicism. The show, from writer Joe DiPietro and musician David Bryan (of Bon Jovi fame), positions itself as something revelatory, and is advertised as a peek behind the curtain to see what really happened when young Diana Spencer married Prince Charles. It does nothing of the sort. Anyone who has watched Netflix’s The Crown or, I don’t know, briefly skimmed a Wikipedia article will already know pretty much everything that’s clumsily explicated in the musical. And the show avoids much of the true darkness at the heart of the matter, because that probably wouldn’t sync up very well with the whole bombastic, commercial Broadway musical thing. 

The musical claims to be telling this story so that we may better understand Diana, to see her as a person, not just an icon. But the production exists entirely to exploit her legacy, to crassly run us through a recitation of known events (and fashion moments) in order to extract more money out of the whole sorry circus. As directed by Tony-winner Christopher Ashley, the show moves at a hurried clip, breezing through major developments as one unmemorable song after another comes burbling out. This is not a considered look at someone’s life; it’s a cash-in that just wants to get to the tragic end, hoping that the audience will convince themselves that they felt something along the way.

Most of Diana’s social media traction thus far has come from people sharing various lyrics from the show, appalled and amused. There is the howler when a man dying of AIDS sings to Diana, “I may be unwell, but I’m handsome as hell.” Or a song in which happily scandalized partygoers sing about “a Thrilla in Manilla with Diana and Camilla.” Or Diana lamenting, “Serves me right for marrying a Scorpio.” Or Diana cooing to her infant son, “​​Harry my ginger-haired son / You’ll always be second to none.”

These lyrics are not, as presented in the production, meant to be silly and campy. They are just the stilted, embarrassingly serious ramblings of a show that has no interest in real humanity. It wants only to rhyme and otherwise approximate what it thinks a musical should be—or, at least, what the form was decades ago, at the height of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s West End dominance. The production is curiously dated in that way, as if it was found in a pile of Cameron Mackintosh’s old papers and mounted on stage without any effort to contemporize. 

The main effect of the musical—quite self-sabotagingly in Netflix’s case, as another heavily Diana-focused season of The Crown is due out next year—is to make us throw our hands up and say enough. No more Diana, please. Let the woman rest. (I realize this may sound rich coming from the digital pages of Vanity Fair—but that’s how strong a repulsion this musical provokes.) Which is where Spencer could maybe be in trouble.

I don’t know how much overlap there will be between Spencer’s likely audience and those who endeavored to slog through Diana. And, really, I have no idea how many people will actually bother to watch Diana at all. But there is a small chance that this gnarly musical could tip the whole Diana-industrial complex into oversaturation, exhausting the topic before Spencer has even had its chance. There are no doubt many people in the world who think that point was reached long ago, but the anticipatory buzz for Spencer suggests that plenty others have not tired of Diana’s story just yet.

Yet they may after Diana, which so garishly (even admirably, in its accidental way) reveals just how much we already know about Diana Spencer and her doomed marriage—and suggests that maybe we shouldn’t. A 36-year-old woman, a mother of two, died in a car crash that was essentially caused by media obsession; a quarter-century later, we face a deluge of content about how terrible that obsession was. It’s a pathetic, staggering irony, one that Spencer is keenly aware of; Diana, meanwhile, fashions itself a noble, worthy homage. 

Whatever Diana may mean for Spencer, I do hope the latter work is the last thing we’ll see about this sad story for a long while. Well, wait, no: We’ll do the remaining seasons of The Crown and then we’ll be done. Unless something major happens with Harry and Meghan. Or one of the other ones. There’s really no telling what turn this saga could take in the future. Maybe the queen will bring back beheadings? That would be pretty dramatic. It probably shouldn’t be a musical, though. If nothing else, I do know that for sure.

More Great Stories From Vanity Fair

— Cover Story: Regina King Is in Her Element
— Even on Film, Dear Evan Hansen Can’t Fix the Musical’s Main Problem
Linda Tripp’s Daughter Wishes Her Mom Was Around to See Impeachment: American Crime Story
— Unlucky Star: The Brief, Bombastic Life of Rudolph Valentino
Emmys 2021 Winners: See the Full List Here
LuLaRich’s Derryl on Taking Down LuLaRoe and Boycotting Kelly Clarkson
— What Michaela Coel Did With I May Destroy You Is Bigger Than the Emmys
Love Is a Crime: Inside One of Hollywood’s Wildest Scandals
Dune Gets Lost in Space
— From the Archive: The Making of Ghostbusters
— Sign up for the “HWD Daily” newsletter for must-read industry and awards coverage—plus a special weekly edition of “Awards Insider.”

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

‘Nosferatu’ Rated “R” for Bloody Violence and “Graphic Nudity”
3rd Bass Has Reunited—and No, Hell Has Not Frozen Over
Book Riot’s Deals of the Day for November 22, 2024
Horror Decor Discontinuing the “Horror Buddies” Line; Now’s Your Last Chance to Grab Them!
The Best Queer Books of 2024, According to Amazon